SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 172

A.K.SIKRI
ISHI KHOSLA – Appellant
Versus
ANIL AGGARWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ankush Mahajan, S.K.BANSAL, Sidharth Chopra, Suwarn Ratan


A. K. SIKRI, J.

( 1 ) AS per the averments made in the plaint, the plaintiff Mrs. Ishi Khosla founded 'm/s. Whole Foods', which is a sole proprietorship firm of the plaintiff. It is engaged in the business of producing and retailing 'healthy and healing food products' in India. It carries on business through various franchise outlets located at Gurgaon and Chandigarh. The plaintiff claims that she is a leading health Counsellor and a former Senior Nutritionist with the Escorts Heart institute and Research Center, New Delhi. She feels pride in bringing forth a unique concept of "one-stop shop' which makes available and sells a wide range of 'healthy and healing foods' to consumers through its 'whole Foods Shop' outlets located in major cities such as New Delhi, Chandigarh and Gurgaon. These foods include all foods that provide good nutrition and promote good health using minimum additives, preservatives and chemicals and are not restricted to just low fat foods. Based on this belief she started retailing health food items like rice, pulses, wheat, oils, roasted namkeens, bakery products like whole wheat bread, cookies and a range of other food items to various authorised select fra
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top