SURESH KAIT
Ashvin Chadha – Appellant
Versus
University of Delhi – Respondent
Suresh Kait, J.:—
1. Vide the instant petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:-
a) Issue appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of writ of certiorari thereby declaring that the very appointment of respondent No.2 as OSD by respondent No. 1 is illegal, unwarranted, unlawful, arbitrary and is violative of Ordinance XVIII Clause 7 (3)(c).
b) Issue appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of writ of certiorari or mandamus thereby holding that continuance of respondent No.2 at the post of Office on Special Duty despite decision of Governing Body vide Resolution dt. 01.10.2011 to the effect that his services are no more required, and furthermore on expiry of tenure of six months in terms of Ordinance XVIII clause 7(3)3(c) is illegal, unlawful and arbitrary and therefore the University of Delhi-respondent No.1 is required to relieve the respondent No.2 (OSD) immediately from Atma Ram Sanatan Dharma College, to enable the petitioner & even Governing Body to function properly;
c) Issue appropriate writ/order/directions in the nature of writ of mandamus t
Jasbhai Motibhai Desai v. Roshan Kumar
Krishan Gopal v. Shri Prakashchandra and others (1974) 1 SCC 128
Mohan. Baitha and others v. State of Bihar and another (2001) 4 SCC 350
Tractors Ltd., Haryana v. Commissioner of Customs
Union of India & Anr. v. Hemraj Singh Chauhan and Others (2010) 4 SCC 290
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.