SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 3564

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
State (NCT of Delhi) – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, APP.
For the Respondents: None.

JUDGMENT :

Siddharth Mridul, J. (Oral):--

Crl. M.A. 395/2015 (Exemption)

The exemption is granted subject to all just exceptions.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

Crl. Rev.P.19/2015

1. The present is a Revision Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) assailing the order dated 22.09.2014 passed by Shri Rajneesh Gupta, ASJ-01, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby the respondents/accused persons have been discharged in FIR No. 263/2013, Police Station Uttam Nagar, under Sections 363/368/120-B IPC.

2. On 21.05.2013 on the complaint of Smt. Dhanesh Devi, mother of the prosecutrix, the aforesaid FIR was registered. After completion of the investigation the Investigating Officer filed charge sheet against the respondents. Thereafter, upon hearing the arguments on charge, the impugned order dated 22.09.2014 has been passed.

3. According to the counsel for the State, the learned Additional Sessions Judge has failed to appreciate that the prosecutrix was 13 years of age at the time of the incident/offence and that, therefore, her consent was immaterial.

4. In the present case, it is observed that as recorded by the learned Trial Judge the prosecutrix in her






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top