Pradeep Nandrajog, J.:--

1. Appellant – the defendant in the suit, assails the order dated July 23, 2014, allowing the application filed by the respondent - plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure granting an interim injunction against the appellant restraining the appellant from using the mark ‘D’DAAZS’ or any other mark deceptively similar to that of the respondent - plaintiff’s trade mark ‘HAAGEN-DAZS’ in relation to ice cream.

2. The respondent - plaintiff company has been incorporated under the laws of Delaware, USA and claims to be marketing, over a hundred consumer brands (processed food and ice cream), in over a hundred countries across the globe. The respondent – plaintiff company claims to be manufacturing desserts such as ice-creams and frozen yogurts under the trademark ‘HAAGEN DAZS’ which according to it is an arbitrary word having no dictionary meaning. ‘HAAGEN DAZS’ has been made available in India only since the year 2007, however, the respondent - plaintiff obtained registration for the mark ‘HAAGEN DAZS’ in India in respect of ice cream, ices, sherbet, sorbet and frozen confections in class 30 with effect from January 21, 19