SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Guj) 13

J.M.SHETH
VANLILA VADILAL SHAH – Appellant
Versus
MAHENDRAKUMAR J. SHAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: P.M.RAVAL, SURESH M.SHAH

J. M. SHETH, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision petition filed by the petitioner-landlord under sec. 29 (2) of the Bombay Rents Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act 1947 (which will be hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge Surendranagar in Civil Appeal No. 101 of 1969 dismissing the petitioners appeal and confirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Judge.

( 2 ) BOTH the Courts below have dismissed the petitioner-landladys suit for eviction which was claimed on account of non-payment of arrears of rent and education cess for a period over six months. By suit notice Ex. 23 demand of arrears of rent for the period between 10-5-1967 and 10 was made. That was the rent which could be claimed as found by the two Courts below. She was not entitled to rent upto 27-5-1968 on the date of the notice as it was broken portion of the month. It was a monthly tenancy and she was entitled to get rent at the end of the month. The month ended on 10-6-1968. That amount came to Rs. 48 The petitioner-landlady had further claimed education cess of Rs. 8 40 paise. Opponent tenant had sent money-order of Rs. 48. 00 within the



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top