SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Guj) 14

J.N.BHATT
VANITABEN NARANBHAI – Appellant
Versus
NARANBHAI RAGHAVBHAI MAKWANA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.A.BUKHARI, M.J.BUDDHBHATTI

BHATT, J.

( 1 ) ). Petitioners herein are the original applicants, who claimed maintenance by invoking the aids of the provisions of Sec. 125 of the Criminal procedure Code, 1973 ("code" for short, hereinafter) from respondent No. 1 herein/original opponent, by filing a Misc. Criminal Application No. 30 of 1987. Petitioner No. 1 is the wife and petitioners Nos. 2 and 3 are the minor children of the opponent. The wife claimed Rs. 400. 00 for her maintenance and also claimed rs. 300/- by way of maintenance for each child per month from the opponent.

( 2 ) ). She inter alia contended that her husband is a man of means and doing wholesale business of kerosene. She further contended that her husband is also owning one taxi-rickshaw and also some building. According to her contention, her husband was earning Rs. 10,000. 00 to Rs. 12,000. 00 per month. She was unable to maintain herself and her two children. She was staying separate. Therefore she claimed maintenance from the opponent for herself and for two children by filing application in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate. First Class, at Jamnagar.

( 3 ) ). Opponent/husband appeared and resisted the claim for maintenance, all























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top