SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 286

J.N.BHATT
SANTOKBAI NARBHERAM BAROT – Appellant
Versus
RAMDAS DWARKADAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.R.KYADA, P.M.RAVAL

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is the original defendant-tenant who has questioned the legality and validity of eviction decree passed in Regular Civil Suit no. 7 of 1978 on 29-4-1981 and confirmed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 95 of 1981 by resorting to the provisions of Sec. 29 (2) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (Bombay Rent Act ). The respondent is the original-plaintiff who is the owner of the suit property situated in Khambhalia and the petitioner original-defendant is the tenant in respect of the said property at a monthly rent of Rs. 3. 00 as per the English Calendar month. The parties are hereinafter referred to as landlord and tenant for the sake of convenience and brevity.

( 2 ) THE landlord served the defendant-tenant with a notice on the ground of non-payment of rent and non-user of the demise premises. The notice was not replied nor complied. Therefore, the suit was filed for eviction on the ground of non-payment of rent under Sec. 12 (3) (a) and on the ground of non-user under Sec. 13 (1) (k) of the Bombay Rent Act.

( 3 ) THE defendant-tenant appeared and resisted the suit by filing written statement ex. 20. It was inter alia conte










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top