SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 675

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :R.R.TRIPATHI
BARODA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION - Appellant
Versus
VADODARA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION - Respondent
S.C.A.3163 of 1991
Decided On : 08/25/2000

Subject

Procedural - Withdrawal of Petition

Headnote

Constitution of India, 1950 — Art. 226 — Writ petition — Application to withdraw writ petition with liberty to approach appropriate forum — Objection by respondent — Plea that availed benefit of stay for 3 years — Objection caused no financial burden — Held, permission to withdraw petition is granted.

       Permission to withdraw the petition is granted with no order as to costs.

       [Para 2]

Advocates Appeared: PRANAV G.DESAI, R.D.RAVAL

R. R. TRIPATHI, J.

( 1 ) : after some arguments, Mr. R. D. Raval, learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach appropriate forum. However, Mr. Raval submitted that as the ad interim relief has continued for all these years since 30. 4. 1991, his request is that the same may be continued for a period of three months to enable him to approach appropriate forum and seek protection. Mr. Desai appearing for the respondent Corporation cannot have any objection to this as the said protection does not cause any financial burden to the respondent Corporation.

( 2 ) PERMISSION to withdraw the petition is granted with no order as to costs. Rule is discharged. Ad interim relief granted earlier is continued upto 15. 12. 2000.


.



1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top