SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 675

RAVI R.TRIPATHI
BARODA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
VADODARA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: PRANAV G.DESAI, R.D.RAVAL

R. R. TRIPATHI, J.

( 1 ) : after some arguments, Mr. R. D. Raval, learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach appropriate forum. However, Mr. Raval submitted that as the ad interim relief has continued for all these years since 30. 4. 1991, his request is that the same may be continued for a period of three months to enable him to approach appropriate forum and seek protection. Mr. Desai appearing for the respondent Corporation cannot have any objection to this as the said protection does not cause any financial burden to the respondent Corporation.

( 2 ) PERMISSION to withdraw the petition is granted with no order as to costs. Rule is discharged. Ad interim relief granted earlier is continued upto 15. 12. 2000.


.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top