SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 841

Y.B.BHATT
MOHAMMEDBHAI S. SHEIKH – Appellant
Versus
VRAJLAL MATHURDAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: G.R.SHAIKH, J.D.AJMERA, MAHBUB M.SHAIKH

Y. B. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision under section 29 (2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 at the instance of the original plaintiff landlord who had sued the respondent-defendant tenant for a decree of eviction of the rented premises under section 12 and 13 of the Bombay Rent Act.

( 2 ) THE petitioner-landlord had sued the respondent-tenant for a decree of eviction on two grounds viz. (1) that the tenant was in arrears of rent for more than six months on the date of the suit notice, and that the tenant had not paid up the amount within 30 days of receipt of the suit notice and (2) that the tenant had made a permanent construction on the rented premises without the prior written consent of the landlord.

( 3 ) THE trial court, after taking into consideration the pleadings of the parties, framed appropriate issues, and after recording the evidence and hearing the learned counsel for the respective parties, rejected the landlords claim for eviction on the ground that the tenant had made a permanent construction on the rented premises. However, the trial court found that the tenant was in arrears of rent of more than six months on the date of the



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top