SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Gau) 1561

UJJAL BHUYAN, RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Hamida Begum – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R. Ali
For the Respondent: Mr. J. Payeng

ORDER :

UJJAL BHUYAN, J.

We have heard Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. J. Payeng, learned special counsel, Foreigners Tribunal (FT).

2. By filing this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 28.1.2016 passed by the Foreigners Tribunal-1, Karimganj in FT Case No. 482/2012 (State v. Mamida Begum) declaring the petitioner to be a foreigner who had illegally entered into India (Assam) from Bangladesh after 25.3.1971.

3. This court by order dated 28.4.2016 had issued notice while requisitioning the case record and passed an interim order to the effect that petitioner should be allowed to remain on bail subject to her appearance before the Superintendent of Police (Border), Karimganj and furnishing of adequate surety.

4. Submissions made by learned counsel for the parties have been considered. Also perused the materials on record, including the record requisitioned from the Tribunal.

5. Before examining the record, we find that the reference was duly contested by the petitioner by filing written statement and by adducing evidence. Petitioner also exhibited a number of documents. After due consideration, Tribunal d





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top