SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 163

GUTTAL, VARGHESE KALLIATH
Regional Director – Appellant
Versus
Vinod – Respondent


Judgment :-

G.H. Gutla1.J.

1. The question which arises for consideration in this appeal by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation of India is whether (i) the payment of daily bhatta to the conductors of the buses and other staff described as "running staff (ii) the incentive allowance paid to such staff and (iii) the payment to the labourers engaged for the maintenance and repairs of the building used by the establishment of the respondent-employer, are "wages" within the meaning of S.2(22) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act). The question arises out of the facts stated in paragraph 2 and 3 below:

2. The respondent is a company known as C.W.M.S.(P) Limited, engaged in the business of transport of passengers. The appellant is the Employees State Insurance Corporation, Trichur, created by the Act. Under the Act, the respondent is liable to pay contribution to the Employees' State Insurance Fund created under Chapter III of the Act. The employer is, under the Act, liable 10 contribute to the Employees' State Insurance Fund. The contribution depends upon and is related to the wages paid to the employees. The respondent made an application




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top