SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Ker) 598

High Court of Kerala
J. CHELAMESWAR & P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON
K.M. Basheer Moulavi & Others
Versus
Kerala State Industrial Development Corporation, Represented by its Managing Director
WA.No.1322 of 1997
Decided On : 05-07-2011

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants:T.M. Abdul Latheef, P.S. Sajid, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Saji Varghese, Advocate.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Contractual Matters - The sole respondent is the Kerala State Industrial Development Corporation. The respondent 'took over' certain properties of a private limited company known as 'Salih Industrial Enterprises Pvt. Ltd'. The property is popularly known as 'Fort Manor' is located at Power House Road, Thiruvananthapuram. Such 'took over' was made in exercise of the power conferred on the respondent under Section 29 of the State Finance Corporation Act obviously on the ground that the abovementioned Salih Industrial Enterprises defaulted in repayment of certain loans due to the respondent Corporation. Subsequent to the take over, the respondent put up the abovementioned property for sale by inviting tenders from interested parties and an advertisement (marked as Ext.P1 in the Original Petition) in this regard was published in the Indian Express Daily dated 28.02.1997. The tender notice in so far as it is relevant for the purpose of the present appeal - Challenged - Held, The deposit of the amount of Rs. 10 lakhs was made initially in response to the condition laid down in the tender notification. At that stage, obviously, the amount being earnest money did not arise as there was no concluded contract. But after the appellant became the successful bidder offering to purchase the property for an amount of Rs. 15 Crores which bid was accepted by the respondent and acceptance communicated to the appellant by Ext.P5, the respondent clearly indicated therein that the amount of Rs. 10 lakhs deposited by the appellant would be treated as Earnest Money and the same would be adjusted towards the sale consideration payable by the appellant herein. It was also indicated in Ext.P5 that if the appellant failed to make the full payment of the consideration as mentioned above the earnest money deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs will stand forfeited to the K.S.I.D.C.. The appellant never protested against the said stipulation contained and appellant communicated his willingness to proceed with the purchase of the property and requested ''¦'¦. that the auction may be confirmed'¦'¦', if only he is permitted to make the payment of Rs. 15 crores within a period of 45 days, but not in instalments as indicated in Ext.P5. Court opinion that amount acquired the character of 'earnest money' and therefore there was nothing illegal in the decision of the respondent to forfeit the said amount, in view of the failure of the appellant to comply with the obligations arising under the contract - Petition dismissed

JUDGMENT :-

J. Chelameswar, J. –


This is an appeal against the judgment in O.P. No.9348 of 1997 dated 01.07.1997, by the petitioner therein.

2. The sole respondent is the Kerala State Industrial Development Corporation. The respondent ‘took over’ certain properties of a private limited company known as ‘Salih Industrial Enterprises Pvt. Ltd’. The property is popularly known as ‘Fort Manor’ is located at Power House Road, Thiruvananthapuram. Such ‘take over’ was made in exercise of the power conferred on the respondent under Section 29 of the State Finance Corporation Act obviously on the ground that the abovementioned Salih Industrial Enterprises defaulted in repayment of certain loans due to the respondent Corporation. Subsequent to the take over, the respondent put up the abovementioned property for sale by inviting tenders from interested parties and an advertisement (marked as Ext.P1 in the Original Petition) in this regard was published in the Indian Express Daily dated 28.02.1997. The tender notice in so far as it is relevant for the purpose of the present appeal reads as follows:

“Details of the tender-cum-auction:

If interest, sealed tenders or a tender-cum-auction basis needs to be submitted to the undersigned on or before 15.00 Hrs on 15.04.1997 along with a Demand Draft for Rs.10 lakhs in a separate cover in the name of KSIDC payable at Trivandrum as Earnest Money Deposit. The auction of the hotel will be conducted at 15.30 Hrs on 15.04.1997 in the office of KSIDC, Keston Road, Kowdiar, Trivandrum. Participants in the auction will have to provide a Demand Draft/Bank Guarantee of Rs.10 lakhs as above. Immediately after the auction, the tender bids will be opened KSIDC reserves the right to accept or reject any tender/auction bid without assigning any reason whatsoever., The acceptance of the offer will be on the basis of the Tender-Cum-Auction. The selected bidder has to remit the full consideration within 45 days of confirmation of sale.”

3. The appellant was one of the persons who responded to the abovementioned advertisement. He submitted a sealed tender along with two demand drafts drawn on the Canara Bank for a cumulative amount of Rs.10 lakhs. Eventually the appellant became the successful bidder who offered Rs.15 Crores for the property. The respondent vide a communication dated 13.04.1997 (Ext.P5) informed the appellant that the offer of the appellant for Rs.15 Crores for the purchase of the property in question was accepted. It further called upon the appellant to make the payment of the amount of Rs.15 Crores in three instalments as indicated in the said communication. It is also indicated in the said communication that the amount of Rs.10 lakhs already deposited would be adjusted towards the purchase price of the property. The communication reads as follows:

“With reference to the Tender-cum-Auction conducted at the office of KSIDC, Trivandrum at 3.30 p.m. on 15.04.1997 and also with reference to your offer of an amount of Rs.15 Crores (Rupees fifteen crores only) towards the consideration of the assets of Salih Industrial Enterprises (P) Ltd., we hereby accept your offer of Rs.15 Crores for the purchase of the assets of Salih Industrial Enterprises (P) Ltd., taken over by KSIDC under Section 29 of the SFC’s Act, situated in Sy.No.2741/1, 2, 3, 4 and 2742/A in Chenganassery Village, Trivandrum Taluk, Powere House Road, Trivandrum in your favour subject to the following terms and conditions:

1. 1/3rd of the quoted amount, i.e., Rs.5 Crores (Rupees Five Crores only) has to be paid by D/D in favour of KSIDC payable at Trivandrum within 7 days of receipt of this letter (ii) another 1/3rd of the quoted amount i.e. Rs.5 Crores (Rupees Five Crores only) has to be paid by D/D within 30 days of receipt of this letter: and (iii) the balance amount, i.e. Rs.4.90 Crores (Rupees Four Crores Ninety Lakhs only) has to be paid within 45 days of acceptance of this letter. (This is after adjusting the earnest money dep





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top