SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Raj) 395

J.R.CHOPRA, R.P.SAXENA
KHUMAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.R.BOHRA, M.N.Singhvi, SANDIP MEHTA

Judgment


J. R. CHOPRA, J

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the Judgment of the learned Sessions Judge Banwara dated 21-8-1989, whereby learned Sessions judge has held that accused-appellants Khumanasing Nawalsingh, Bahadursing, Mansingh, Ramsingh, Mansingh S/o Budha Tejpalsingh, Kantilal, Raju, Abhaysingh and Ramdeosingh guilty of the offences under Sections 148 and 302/149 IPC and sentenced each of them to one years rigorous imprisonment for the offence, under S. 148 IPC and they have been further sentenced to life imprisonment together with a fine of Rs. 500. 00 each and in default of payment of this amount of fine, to undergo one months rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 302/149 IPC. Both these sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

( 2 ) THE facts necessary to be noticed for the disposal of this appeal briefly stated are : that this occurrence took place somewhere in between the gate of Banswara Syntex Mills and Khandu Gate on 24-3-1985 at about 7. 10 or 7. 15 a. m. The person who was seriously. injured and ultimately died was Shyamsingh, who was then President of the INTUC Union of the employees of the Banswara Syntex Mills. It is alleged that when Sh
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top