SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Raj) 636

B.R.ARORA, RAJESH BALIA
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Raja Ram – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This appeal is directed against the judgment dated September 23, 1976, passed by the Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar, by which the learned Sessions Judge acquitted the accused-respondent Raja Ram of the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, but convicted and sentenced him under Section 20 of the Indian Arms Act.

2. Accused Raja Ram was tried by the learned Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar, for the offence under Section 302 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Indian Arms Act for committing the murder of his father Kheta Ram on April 14, 1975.

3. The case of the prosecution is that Smt. Barma (PW 3)-the sister of the accused was-married to Dharampal. Her relations with Dharampal were not cordial and, therefore, she left her in-laws' house and used to reside with her father Khetaram in village Jodkiya. Some days before the date of the incident, Mst. Barma expressed her desire to her brother accused Rajaram that she wanted to go to her in-laws house. The accused was, also, interested in sending her to her in-laws' house and, therefore, on the date of the incident, i.e,, April 14, 1975, he called Dharampal his brother-in-law to his house so that he could send his sister Mst.




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top