SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 2743

SANDEEP MEHTA
Rakesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Rajendra Charan, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mahipal Hishnoi, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with FIR No. 110/2011, registered at Police Station Asind, Distt. Bhilwara for the offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Section 3(1)(XII) of the SC/ST Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this case, the prosecutrix Mst. "S", who is the daughter of Bheru Lal had gone missing on 15.04.2011. The missing person report No. 4/2011 was registered at the Police Station Asind at the instance of Bheru Lal and the investigation on the said report was being done by one Chand Singh, Head Constable. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was called in connection with the said missing person report and was being tried to be implicated as an accused for abducting the girl. In the meantime, the girl Mst. "S" was recovered on 03.06.2011 and her statement was recorded in connection with the aforesaid missing person report, in which, she stated that she had gone voluntarily with Nand Lal, a person whom she knew from before. In the said statement, she has also stated that she entered into an agreement with Nand Lal at the court premise













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top