SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 1653

MAHESH BHAGWATI
Purshottam Vishnoi – Appellant
Versus
Additional District Judge – Respondent


For the Petitioner:Suresh Goyal with Abdul Samad, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

1. - By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioner Purshottam Vishnoi has beseeched to quash and set-aside the order dated 7th September, 2011, whereby the learned Additional District Judge No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur dismissed the application of the petitioner filed under Section 10 CPC.

2. Adumbrated in brief, the facts of the case are that the respondent no.2 Mohd. Rafiq Khan and respondent no.3 Keshar Hassan Khan jointly filed a suit for restoration of possession against the petitioner-defendant. This suit has been pending in the court of Additional District Judge No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur. During the pendency of the suit, the petitioner filed an application under Section 10 of CPC stating that there is one more suit, which came to be filed by Mukhtar Hassan Khan, Shuaib Khan and Keshar Hassan Khan against Waqf Board and other parties. Since the parties in both the suits are common and the matter in issue is also directly and indirectly common in both the suits, the proceedings of the later suit be stayed U/s. 10 of CPC. The learned trial court, having heard both the parties, dismissed the application, as indicated here-in-above.

3. Heard the learned











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top