RAGHUVENDRA S.RATHORE
Bholu alias Hanuman – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
The accused-appellants, by this appeal under Section 374(2), Cr.P.C. have sought to challenge the judgment dated 2-11-1985 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dausa, District Jaipur by which they have been convicted and sentenced as under :
S. No. Accused Conviction Sentence
1. Bholu @ Hanuman and Ratan Lal
u/S. 307 IPC 4 year's R.I. and a fine of Rs. 400/- in default of which to further undergo 6 month's R.I.
u/S. 324/149 IPC 2 year's R.I. and a fine of Rs.200/- in default of which to furhter undergo 3 month's R.I.
u/S. 354/148 IPC 1 year's R.I. and a fine of Rs.100/- in default of which to further undergo 3 month's R.I.
2. Vimal Garg u/S. 307 IPC 4 year's R.I. and a fine of Rs.400/- in default of which to further undergo 6 month's R.I.
u/S. 324/149 IPC 2 year's R.I. and a fine of Rs.200/- in default of which to furhter undergo 3 month's R.I.
u/S. 354/148 IPC 1 year's R.I. and a fine of Rs.100/- in default of which to further undergo 3 month's R.I.
u/S. 307/149 IPC 4 year's R.I. and a fine of Rs.400/- in default of which to further undergo 6 month's R.I.
u/S. 324 IPC 2 year's R.I. and a fine of Rs.200/- in default of which to furhter undergo 3 month's R.I.
u/S. 354/148
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.