RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, A.K.SIKRI
Badshah – Appellant
Versus
Sou. Urmila Badshah Godse – Respondent
2. The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 28.2.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad in Criminal Writ Petition No.144/2012. By means of the impugned order, the High Court has upheld the award of maintenance to respondent No.1 at the rate of Rs.1000/- per month and to respondent No.2 (daughter) at the rate of Rs.500/- per month in the application filed by them under Sec. 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) by the learned Trial Court and affirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. Respondents herein had filed proceedings under Section 125, Cr.P.C. before Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) alleging therein that respondent No.1 was the wife of the petitioner herein and respondent No.2 was their daughter, who was born out of the wedlock.
3. The respondents had stated in the petition that respondent No.1 was married wit
Yamunabai Anantrao Adhav vs. Anantrao Shivram Adhay & Anr. ((1988) 1 SCC 530) 9
Savitaben Somabai Bhatiya vs. State of Gujarat & Ors. ((2005) 3 SCC 636 = RLW 2005(2) SC 307) 9
Dwarika Prasad Satpathy vs. Bidyut Prava Dixit & Anr. ((1999) 7 SCC 675 = RLW 2000(1) SC 23) 10
Chanmuniya vs. Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha & Anr. ((2011) 1 SCC 141) 12
Rameshchandra Daga vs. Rameshwari Daga (AIR 2005 SC 422) 24
Capt. Ramesh Chander Kaushal vs. Veena Kaushal ((1978) 4 SCC 70) 27
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.