SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Raj) 333

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Chotha Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sumer Singh with Mr. S. K. Sainee, for the Appellants; Mr. Sudhir Tak, PP, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.51/2019, Police Station Samdari, District Barmer for the offences under Sections 363, 366-A, 376(D) & 323 of IPC and Section 5(G)/6 of the Protection Children From Sexual Offence Act, 2012.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the victim has appeared before the learned trial Court as PW-4. She has not supported the prosecution case & thus, she has been declared hostile. The other prosecution witnesses i.e. mother and father of the victim have also not supported the case of the prosecution and they too have been declared hostile. He further submits that the co-accused Chelaram has been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.02.2020. Therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top