SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Raj) 122

G.M.LODHA
Gheesa Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.L. Pareek, for Petitioner; P. Kuhad, for Respondent No. 2.

G.M. LODHA, J.—The respondeat No. 2 has filed this application under Art. 226(3) of the Constitution of India. It has been prayed that ad interim stay order dated 15th July, 1980 passed by this Court be vecated. The aforesaid order dated 15.7.1980 was in the following terms:

"Honble Agrawal J.,

Mr. G.L. Pareek for the petitioner.

Issue notice of the stay application. In the mean while, the respondents are restrained from dispossessing the petitioner from the land of the petitioner in Khasra No. 539, if he has not already been dispossessed till today."

2. This order was passed ex-parte without service of notice or giving of copies of the petition to the respondents.

3. Respondent No. 2 filed this application for vacation of the stay order and furnished a copy of it to the petitioner. Copy was furnished on 8th September, 1980. Application was filed in the court on 9th September, 1980. According to the computation two weeks time have expired on 23rd September, 1980.

4. Mr. Pareeks submission is that inspite of expiry of two weeks time, stay order will not stand vacated because firstly, there was no stay order against respondent No. 2 and secondly, this application was not listed within two










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top