SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 916

M.K.MUKHERJEE, K.T.THOMAS
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Zakaullah – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Prashant Kumar, Advocate, for A.S. Pundir, Advocate for Appellant Rachna Gupta, Advocate for Respondent

Honble THOMAS, J. – This is a Government appeal assailing the acquittal of a government servant from graft charge. Respondent government servant was convicted by the trial court under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and also Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1947 and was sentenced to substantive terms of imprisonment and fine but he was acquitted by a single Judge of the Allahabad High Court when he appealed against the conviction and sentence.

(2). Respondent was working as Revenue Inspector (Wasil Baki Nawis) in a Sub-Tehsil in Nainital District. The nub of the case against him is that he received Rs. 400/- as bribe from PW 5 Satpal Singh for doing an official act and he was caught red- handed with the bribed amount by the Anti-corruption officials, After obtainingsanction from the government, respondent was challaned. In his defence, he disputed the entire incident and contended that it was a concocted case against him.

(3). More details about the case : A person by name Naubat was in occupation of a certain land situate in the sub-Tehsil Kaladhungi (Nainital District). Since the occupation was illegal proceedings have been afoot for evicting him. PW-5 Satpal S














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top