DHARAM CHAND CHAUDHARY, SURESHWAR THAKUR
Lekh Raj – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
Sureshwar Thakur, Judge. (Oral):
1. The petitioner stands aggrieved by Annexure P-1 whereby the Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. refused to refer for adjudication to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal (hereinafter referred to in short as ‘the Tribunal’) concerned the industrial dispute raised by the petitioner herein/workman qua the factum of his having stood illegally retrenched or disengaged from service by his employer. The Industrial dispute as reared or engendered by the petitioner herein/workman qua his services standing illegally retrenched besides dispensed with by his employer stood nursed by him after an inordinately procrastinated delay of 9 years. The Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. in refusing under annexure P-1 to make a reference for an adjudication by the Tribunal concerned upon the industrial dispute raised by the workman/petitioner herein qua his illegal disengagement/retrenchment from service by his employer had therein constituted the reason of its imprompt raising having sequelled its becoming stale. His construing of the industrial dispute raised by the petitioner/workman qua the latter’s purported illegal dispensing of services by his employ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.