RAJESH BINDAL
Amar Rice Mills – Appellant
Versus
Union Bank of India – Respondent
ORDER :
Rajesh Bindal, J.
1. The petitioners have approached this Court impugning the order dated 28.01.2020 passed by the learned Court below, vide which their right to file written statement has been closed and the case has been put up for evidence of the plaintiff-respondent herein.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that a Civil Suit was filed by the respondent-Bank against the petitioners on 29.05.2019, in which petitioners were served on 27.08.2019. However, copy of the plaint was not accompanying the notice. Hence, the petitioners were not able to prepare and file their written statement. When the case was listed before the Court below on 01.10.2019, the petitioners had put in their appearance and the copy of the Suit and the annexures were supplied to them at that time. Time was sought to file the written statement. The case was adjourned to October 30, 2019. As the petitioner No. 2 is about 80 years of age and was not keeping good health and was even operated upon, though the written statement was prepared, however, the same could not be signed and filed in the Court. On 28.01.2020, the learned Court below rejected the application of the petitioners for extensio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.