SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Baleshwar Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.
1. This application has been referred by petitioners against the orders dated 23.10.1999 passed in Certificate Case No. 279/98-99 and order dated 30.10.1999 passed in Certificate Case No. 280/98-99 whereby and whereunder the respondent- District Certificate Officer, Hazaribagh directed the petitioners to deposit the amount, in question, in lieu of less Court-fee stamp made for registered deeds.
2. The case of the petitioner is that they purchased two sets of land from one Deoki Devi, vide two registered deed Nos. 4327 and 4317, dated 21.4.1992 duly registered by the District Sub-registrar, Hazaribagh, for an area mentioned in the deeds. In the year 1996, when it came to the notice of the vendor and vendees, certain mistake in respect to plots made correction in 1992 registered deeds through two separate registered deeds executed on 8.11.1996.
The Registrar. Registration Officer, Hazaribagh, vide letter dated 6.2.1997 while referred the subsequent registered deeds dated 8.11.1996, intimated the petitioners that th(sic) are liable to pay more stamp duty/registration fee, the valuation having shown Rs. 9,000/- and registration fee having enhanced since promulga
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.