SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Mad) 56

MAHARAJAN, VENKATARAMAN
In Re : Ganesan, Accused – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:S. Narayanaswamy, Amicus Curiae, Advocates.

Judgment :-

VENKATARAMAN, J.

This is an appeal against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge of North Arcot convicting the appellant. Ganesan, of the murder of his wife and sentencing him to imprisonment for life. It is alleged that he cut her with a bill-hook (M.O. 1) in his house at Thiruvannamalai, about 8.30 a.m. on 8-1-1972.

2. They had been married just a few months before. But their marital relationship had not been happy. The appellant had a suspicion, which seems to us to be well founded, that she had been in sexual intimacy with her elder sister's husband, P.W. 6, and further, she had been refusing conjugal felicity to her husband, the appellant, P.W. 1, the eight year old daughter of an other elder sister of the deceased Kamala, was staying temporarily with the appellant and the deceased. On the day in question the appellant asked P.W. 1, to go and get onions. The deceased pointed out that she might be involved in some accident and declined to send her. This alone according to the prosecution, was the motive for the appellant taking the bill-hook nearby and inflicting several cuts on his wife. The murder was witnessed not merely by P.W. 1 but also by P.W. 2, who resid

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top