VENUGOPAL
Abdul Azeez Sahib – Appellant
Versus
Dhanabagiammal – Respondent
ORDER :- One of the legal representatives of the deceased plaintiff who has obtained a decree for costs against the defendants has filed this civil revision petition. The defendants and the other legal representatives of the deceased decree holder are the respondents.
2. One Abdul Sukkoor Sahib filed a suit in O.S. No. 712 of 1966 on the file of the District Munsif. Tindivanam, for injunction against the two defendants (respondents 1 and 15 herein) restraining them from interfering with plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the suit properties. The suit was dismissed, and on appeal, the suit was decreed and the plaintiff was awarded costs. The plaintiff died on 17-5-1971. Without impleading his legal representatives, the appeal was disposed of on 15-7-1971. The plaintiff's power agent filed an execution petition for recovery of costs and the petition was dismissed since batta was not paid. A second execution petition was filed by the power agent of the legal heirs of the plaintiff. In E.A. No 804 of 1973, by consent, the legal representatives of the plaintiff were added as parties and they are the petitioner and respondents 2 to 14 herein. In E.A. No. 805 of 1973, the po
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.