SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Mad) 71

S.PADMANABHAN
K. M. Madhavakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
S. R. Sami – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. Padmanabhan, J.

1. The Additional plaintiff in O.S. No. 71 of. 1968, who is the son and legal representative of Paramayee Animal, the deceased first plaintiff, is the appellant. Paramayee Ammal having died pending suit, her son the appellant was brought on record as her legal representative. Paramayee Ammal filed the suit for a declaration that the agreement of sale executed by her in favour of defendants 1 and 2 on 17th June, 1967 was void and inoperative and for other reliefs. The suit was dismissed by the trial Court and consequently the present appeal has been filed.

2. The facts of the case may be briefly set out as follows : One Marimuthu Pillai, the husband of Paramayee Animal was the owner of an extent of 4.04 acres of land comprised in T.S. No. 1332 in Erode Town. Marimuthu Pillai died in 1953 leaving two widows one of whom was Paramayee Ammal and two sons Venugopal and Rajagopal through his first wife and a son Madhavakrishnan, the appellant herein and a daughter Lakshmi though his second wife Paramayee Ammal. On the death of Marimuthu Pillai disputes arose between the first plaintiff on the one hand and her son, the second plaintiff and step-sons on the other. T




























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top