SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 3287

R.S.RAMANATHAN
Koshe – Appellant
Versus
A. Natarajan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:V.P. Raman, Advocate.
For the Respondent:C.R. Rukmani, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :-

1. The defendant in O.S.No.44 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Alandur, is the appellant.

2. The respondent/ plaintiff filed the suit for permanent injunction stating that the suit property and adjoining pathway on the east and property on the north and south originally belonged to Jesubatham and the total extent of property was admeasuring 60 feet and 90 feet. The said Jesubatham sold the northern portion measuring 5400 square feet to D.S. Mathias and naming the Plot as Plot No.27-A and while selling the said extent he left the pathway on the eastern side measuring 90 feet in length north-south and 6 feet in breadth east-west, for having ingress and egress to the property in Plot No.27-B which is situate on the southern side of Plot No.27-A. Plot No.27-B was also sold by Jesupatham on the same day and in that sale deed also the pathway on the eastern side of the property in Plot No.27-A was mentioned for having ingress and egress to the Plot No.27-B. Later, D.S. Mathias divided the property, he purchased under the sale deed dated 19.12.1947 into two plots and sold one plot to one Krishnan Kutty and another plot to Thomas P.Ryan under two sale deeds date
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top