SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 2361

K.K.SASIDHARAN
Koothayyan – Appellant
Versus
Minor Ayyappan, rep. by next friend/father Umapathi – Respondent


Advocates:
ADVOCATE APPEARED:
P. Valliappan, for Appellant

JUDGMENT

K.K. SASIDHARAN, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 25.1.2008 made in A.B. No. 124 of 2005 on the file of Subordinate Court, Kallakurichi confirming the judgment and Decree of the II Additional District Munsif, Kallakurichi, dated 28.10.2004 made in O.S. No. 392 of 1999.

2. The suit O.S. No. 392 of 1999 has been filed by the respondent through his father praying for a decree for cancellation of the Sale Deed dated 22.2.1999 executed by the respondent’s mother Thangamani in favour of the appellant in respect of half share of the property in ‘A’ Schedule and for declaration that the respondent is entitled to half share in the veil, motor and electricity service connection to the well mentioned in the ‘A Schedule Property.

3. In the plaint in O.S. No. 392 of 1999, it was the case of the respondent (plaintiff) that the property in S. No. 112/4 and other properties were in possession of Thangammal and the well was dug in the said property and electricity connection was also obtained. The said Thangammal executed a Sale Deed dated 23.6.1995 in respect of half share along with the well and service connection and one acre of land in the ‘B’ Schedule Pr













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top