ARUNA JAGADEESAN
Inamdhar Pallivasal Wakf by its Muthavalli I. Shamiyan Sahib, Tiruchirappalli – Appellant
Versus
Sheik Abdullah – Respondent
1. These Civil Revision Petition are filed against the order dated 9.4.2011 made in IA.No.37/2011 in WOP.No.1/2010 by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge (Wakf Tribunal), Tiruchirappalli, allowing the rejection petition in WOP.No.1/2010 and consequently striking off the same from the file of the Wakf Tribunal.
2. The Petitioner/Inamdhar Pallivasal Wakf represented by its Muthawali filed the suit against the Respondent herein in WOP.No.1/2010 for permanent injunction restraining the Respondent from interfering with the possession of the Petitioner in the schedule mentioned property either by way of trespass or otherwise in any manner whatsoever. The Respondent in the said suit has filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of CPC to reject the main WOP.No.1/2010 and in consequence thereof to strike of the same from the file of the Wakf Tribunal. The same has been allowed by the Tribunal and aggrieved against the same, the Petitioner has preferred these Civil Revision Petitions.
3. In the said application, it has been stated by the Respondent that there was a rental agreement between the erstwhile Muthavalli and the Respondent's father and after him, the Respondent a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.