SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT (DB)
Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Pushpa Sathyanarayana, JJ.
T.K. Shanmugam Secretary C.P.I. (M) North Chennai District - Petitioner
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government Department of Revenue - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 1295 of 2009
Decided On : 27-11-2015

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. N.G.R. Prasad for Mr. S. Sivakumar and J. Prataban, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Mr. P.H. Aravind Pandian, AAG Assisted by Mr. V.R. Kamalanathan, AGP., Mr. K. Rajasrinivas, Mr. N. Ramesh, Mr. S. Shinu, Advocate.

Headnote:

Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007 – Need to protect the environment has emerged as a burning issue, which ultimately lead to the new concept of sustainable development. Since time immemorial, people across the world have always made efforts to preserve and protect the natural resources like air, water, plants, flora and fauna – Lakes and water bodies are gifts of nature – There is no possibility of getting further gifts of such nature – Court should be content with the resources already given by the nature – Therefore, court should protect these valuable resources so as to enable the future generation to maintain it for the years to come for common good of all –Held, While answering the reference in a Writ Petition filed at the instance of the petitioner herein, Full Bench of this Court, after considering the various Government Orders and the judgments of this Court and also following the observations and directions issued by the Honble Apex Court, vide order, has held that even the tanks which do not fall within the purview of the Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007, also require protection from encroachment and any encroachment made in such tanks or water bodies have to be removed by following the provisions of the Act – It is significant to point out that the Honble Apex Court in a series of judgments, has held that statutory rules cannot be amended by Executive instructions but "if the rules are silent" on any particular point, Government can fill up the gaps by issuing executive instructions, in conformity with the existing rules – Having regard to the acute water scarcity recurring in the State of Tamil Nadu as a whole, we feel that a time has come where the State has to take some definite measures to restore the already ear marked water storage tanks, ponds and lakes, to its original status as part of its rain water harvesting scheme, which has already been initiated – Writ Petition fails and the same stands dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Pushpa Sathyanarayana, J.

The need to protect the environment has emerged as a burning issue, which ultimately lead to the new concept of 'sustainable development. Since time immemorial, people across the world have always made efforts to preserve and protect the natural resources like air, water, plants, flora and fauna. Lakes and water bodies are gifts of nature. There is no possibility of getting further gifts of such nature. We should be content with the resources already given by the nature. Therefore, we should protect these valuable resources so as to enable the future generation to maintain it for the years to come for common good of all. There should be a harmonious approach in the matter of development vis-a-vis ecology. Environment plays a pivotal role in the life of human beings and, therefore, it is necessary to have a study with regard to impact on ecology because of the massive projects of development involving utilisation of natural wealth like wet lands, water bodies, lakes, etc.

2. Article 51-A(g) of our Constitution contains a Constitutional mandate to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life. The Hon'ble Supreme Court by way of series of judgments, interpreting Article 21 of the Constitution evolved the concept of 'sustainable development', in the interest of our economy as well as environment.

3. When it is a recognised principle that tanks, rivers and water-bodies are all communal properties belonging to the public at large, environmental management is not the concern of the Government alone and it is the responsibility of the people as well. Unfortunately, in the eagerness to acquire more and more property, even rivers, water bodies and lakes are not left free. Cases of encroachment on water bodies are really alarming. Water bodies are potential source for drinking water for human and cattle. Only with a view to protect the same and to help the environment and develop ecology, the Government has enacted the Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007 (Tamil Nadu Act 8 of 2007). The very object of the Act is to find the exact boundary of each Tank in Tamil Nadu and also to detect encroachments for eviction as per the procedure laid down in the said Act. However, there are instances where the public raised fingers against the Government also when it has forgotten the laws meant for preserving water bodies and attempted to fill up those natural streams under the guise of development. Occupation of the water bodies by way of encroachment will deprive water to the public in larger interest ignoring the Public Trust Doctrine.

4. The instant writ petition is one such case where apprehending reversal of land reforms and undermining the land ceiling laws, the petitioner, Secretary of a Political Party, viz., C.P.I. (M) North Chennai District Committee, has invoked Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of Mandamus directing the revenue authorities to grant patta by regularising the encroachments.

5. A perusal of the papers would show that G.O. Ms. No. 854 dated 30.12.2006 had prescribed a one time scheme for regularising encroachments for persons applying before 30.6.2007. Subsequently, the deadline was extended upto 30.9.2009 by virtue of G.O. Ms. No. 579 dated 03.10.2008. In the meanwhile, this Court by order dated 04.10.2007 in W.P. Nos. 25776 of 2006 and 17915 of 1993, sought to remove encroachments in the water bodies and water courses numbering about 29 in and around the city of Chennai. Based on the said order, eviction notices were issued by the officials of the second respondent, to the encroachers in January 2009.

6. At this juncture, it is pertinent to note that in the aforesaid Writ Petitions, the Secretary to Government had filed an affidavit to the effect that the State Government has taken a policy decision to restore the water bodies in the city of Chennai to their original shape, size, capacity,


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top