Back
S. S. SUNDAR, G. R. SWAMINATHAN, R. VIJAYAKUMAR
Sasikala – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer cum Sub Collector, Devakottai, Sivagangai District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petitions filed under article 226 challenging cancellation deeds. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. reference made to conflicting judgements and legal standards regarding registration. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. registrar lacks authority to cancel registered transactional deeds. (Para 10 , 22) |
| 4. legal framework under registration act and corresponding rules. (Para 23 , 25) |
| 5. conclusion drawn regarding the validity of petitioners' claims. (Para 46 , 47) |
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the 1st respondent in Mu.Mu.A1/2219/2015 dated 28.08.2018 and quash the same. Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the deed of cancellation dated 07.01.2009 executed by the 3rd respondent and registered on the file of the 2nd respondent as documents No.32 of 2009 as null and void and in consequence thereof direct the 2nd respondent to release the deed of partition dated 23.06.2020 registered as document no.975 of 2020 at once.)
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the C
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
