HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T. RAJA, D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
I.S. Ibrahim & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
The Principal Secretary to the Government, Backward Class, Most Backward Class and Minorities Welfare (T1) Department, Secretariat, Chennai & Ors. - Respondents
W.A.No. 1339 of 2022 & O.A.Nos. 240, 318 & 410 of 2021 & A.Nos. 273, 1156, 1653 & 1175 of 2021 & CMP.Nos. 8517 & 8518 of 2022
Decided On : 13-04-2023
Waqf Board - Management of M.K.P.Maracayar and Masid Moqdoomi Trust - Waqf Act, 1995 - Section 65(2), Section 32, Section 64(5) - The judgment discusses the replacement of the Scheme Court by the Waqf Board as per Section 32 of the Waqf Act, 1995. It also highlights the powers of the Waqf Board to take over the management of the Waqf properties and the role of the Official Trustee in administering the properties under the Scheme Decree. The judgment emphasizes the need for compliance with the Official Trustees Act, 1913 in transferring the management of the Waqf properties to the Waqf Board.
Fact of the Case:
The case involves a dispute over the management of the M.K.P.Maracayar and Masid Moqdoomi Trust, which is a Waqf established for religious and charitable purposes. The Waqf Board issued an order to take over the management of the Trust, which was challenged in a Writ Petition. The court considered the powers of the Waqf Board and the role of the Official Trustee in administering the Trust under the Scheme Decree.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Waqf Board had replaced the Scheme Court as per Section 32 of the Waqf Act, 1995. It held that the Official Trustee, under the Scheme Decree, was bound by the directions of the Court and could only transfer the management of the Trust properties to the Waqf Board as per the Official Trustees Act, 1913. The court quashed the impugned orders and directed the Official Trustee to entrust the management of the Trust properties to the Waqf Board.
Issues: The key issues revolved around the authority of the Waqf Board to take over the management of the Trust, the role of the Official Trustee in administering the Trust, and the compliance with the provisions of the Waqf Act, 1995 and the Official Trustees Act, 1913.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Section 32 of the Waqf Act, 1995, and the Official Trustees Act, 1913. It emphasized the need for the Official Trustee to comply with the directions of the Court and the procedure under the Official Trustees Act, 1913 for transferring the management of the Trust properties to the Waqf Board.
Final Decision: The court partly allowed the Writ Appeal, quashed the impugned orders, and directed the Official Trustee to entrust the management of the Trust properties to the Waqf Board. It also allowed certain applications and dismissed others, transferring the authority over the Trust to the Waqf Board as per the provisions of the Waqf Act, 1995.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer in W.A.No.1339 of 2022: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order dated 10.12.2022 made in W.P.No.2504 of 2021 by the Learned Single Judge of this Court.)
Common Judgment:
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.
A. The Appeal:
Writ Appeal No.1339 of 2022 is filed against the order of the Learned Single Judge, in W.P.No.2504 of 2021, dated 10.12.2022, in and by which the Writ Petition filed by the petitioners/appellant herein, challenging the order of the Waqf Board dated 04.11.2020, thereby taking over the management of the Trust Estate of M.K.P.Maracayar and Masid Moqdoomi Waqf, George Town, Chennai District, under the direct management of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, for a period of one year, was dismissed on the ground that aggrieved parties are entitled to file an appeal to the Government under Section 65(2) of the Waqf Act, 1995.
1.1 Original Application No.410 of 2021 is filed by one of the lineal descendants of the maker of the Trust in C.S.No.314 of 1930, which is the scheme suit by which the subject matter Trust is administered, with a prayer to grant an interim injunction against the respondents 2 to 17 therein, from interfering with the administration and management of the above said Trust.
1.2 Original Application Nos.240 & 318 of 2021 are also filed by yet another lineal descendant Hajee A.M.Farook, with the same prayer. The Association of Worshipers and Well Wishers of “Masjid – e – Moqdoomi”, have filed Application No.1175 of 2021 in C.S.No.314 of 1930, to direct the first respondent/Applicant, namely, the Administrative General and Official Trustee of Madras, not to handover the administration of the above Trust to the Waqf Board or any other Waqf Authorities.
1.3 Application No.1653 of 2021 is filed by Hajee A.M.Farook, challenging the order dated 23.03.2021, by which the District Superintendent of Waqf constituted a nine member Committee to manage the affairs of the Trust.
1.4 Application No.273 of 2021 is filed by the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, for a direction to transfer the entire papers relating to M.K.P.Maracayar and Masid Moqdoomi Waqf, which was the subject matter of the scheme of administration under C.S.No.314 of 1930, from the file of this Court to that of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board.
1.5 Application No.1156 of 2021 is filed by one I.S.Ibrahim, to implead themselves as respondents in A.No.273 of 2021, filed by the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board. The impleading stands allowed.
1.6 The question involved in this case, is as to whether the taking over the management by the Waqf Board in respect of the M.K.P.Maracayar and Masid Moqdoomi Trust is in order and what directions are to be given in respect of the above Trust, in which the Official Trustee is appointed by this Court in the Scheme Suit to conduct the affairs of the Trust. Since we found that the prayers in the applications and in the Writ Appeal are all interconnected and revolve around the above said question, we directed the applications pending on the original side of this Court to be listed along with the present Writ Appeal. After hearing all the learned Counsel, these matters are disposed off by this common judgment.
B. The Brief Facts:
2. The brief facts leading to the filing of these applications are that one M.K.Periyathambi Maracayar by a Deed dated 25.04.1919, declared a Charitable Trust by donating four of his immovable properties and appointing a Muthawallis to manage the affairs of the Trust. The purposes of the trust are religious(Mohamedan) and charitable in nature.
2.1 Thereafter, a suit came to be filed in respect of the said Trust under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, on the file of the Extra-Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction of this Court by one K.M.Moulana Abdul Raheem in C.S.No.314 of 1930 and this Court had framed a scheme by a Decree dated 02.05.1939 whereby the Official Trust
The main legal point established in the judgment is the replacement of the Scheme Court by the Waqf Board as per Section 32 of the Waqf Act, 1995, and the requirement for the Official Trustee to comp....
The Waqf Board must adhere to the rules of succession as per the waqf deed, reinforcing the principle of governance according to established customs and the intent of the waqif.
The court established that a Waqf must have a public or charitable dedication to be classified as composite; otherwise, it remains a private Waqf, confirming the hereditary nature of the Muthawalli o....
The power to remove a Mutawalli under Section 64 of the Waqf Act vests exclusively with the Waqf Board, and direct management under Section 65 should align with the established Scheme Decree to ensur....
The Waqf Board acted without jurisdiction in recalling the managing committee's appointment, violating statutory procedures and principles of natural justice.
The Chief Executive Officer of the Waqf Board lacks inherent power to review its own orders, and disputes must be addressed before the Waqf Tribunal as per the Waqf Act, 1995.
The Chairman of the Waqf Board has the authority to appoint a new Management Committee post supersession based on the provisions of the Waqf Act.
Waqf Board must follow waqf deed directions and conduct enquiry with notice before registering mutawalli.
The Chief Executive Officer of the Waqf Board lacks inherent power to review its own orders; disputes must be addressed by the Waqf Tribunal as per the Waqf Act, 1995.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.