SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 1354

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
G.C.Garg, J.
Ajmer Singh
Versus
State Of Punjab
Civil Revision No. 1350 of 1996,
Decided On : SEPTEMBER 6, 1996

The decision on the question of jurisdiction may depend on the decision on another substantive legal issue, and in such cases, the court may decline to treat the issue of jurisdiction as a preliminary issue.

Headnote:

Jurisdiction - Civil Court - The court declined to treat the issue of jurisdiction as a preliminary issue, as the question of title was apparently involved in the case and the decision on jurisdiction would depend on the decision on the question of title.

Fact of the Case:

The defendant filed an application to treat the issue of jurisdiction as a preliminary issue, which was declined by the court. The defendant argued that jurisdiction is a pure question of law and should be decided first, while the plaintiff argued that the question of title is involved and the decision on jurisdiction would depend on the decision on the question of title.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the question of title was apparently involved in the case and the decision on jurisdiction would depend on the decision on the question of title. Therefore, the court declined to treat the issue of jurisdiction as a preliminary issue.

Issues: The main issue was whether the issue of jurisdiction should be treated as a preliminary issue or not.

Ratio Decidendi: The decision on the question of jurisdiction would depend on the decision on the question of title, and therefore, the court declined to treat the issue of jurisdiction as a preliminary issue.

Final Decision: The revision petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Judgment

G.C.Garg, J.

1. This revision has been directed against the order of Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Faridkot, whereby an application filed by the defendant for treating issue No. 5 relating to the jurisdiction of the Court as a preliminary issue was declined. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue of jurisdiction is a pure question of law and ought to have been ordered to be decided in the first instance as the defendant petitioner at whose instance this issue had been framed will not lead any evidence. Learned counsel further submitted that in case it is held that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to try the matter, the entire suit shall stand disposed of.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents on the other hand submitted that the land in dispute was taken by the defendant-petitioner on lease and did not vacate thereafter. An order of eviction was passed against him and the writ petition filed against the order of eviction was dismissed and in execution of that order the defendant-respondents took possession. It was thereafter the petitioner filed a petition Under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, by producing certain forged and fabricated documents and on the basis thereof the Addl. Director, Consolidation of Holdings Punjab, passed an order in favour of the petitioner. In the suit filed by the State of Punjab question of title is involved and once that is so the issue of jurisdiction cannot be treated as a preliminary issue. According to the learned counsel if it is proved that defendant-petitioner has no title to the property, the civil Court will have jurisdiction to entertain the suit. Learned counsel in support of his submission placed reliance on a Full Bench decision of this Court in Ajit Singh v. Subhagan and Ors. 1969 Current Law Journal 471. It is in this situation learned counsel submitted that the issue of jurisdiction in the facts and circumstances of this case cannot be ordered to be treated as a preliminary issue.

3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of this, I find that the question of title is apparently involved in this case and decision on the question of jurisdiction will depend on the decision on the question of title. In that view of the matter the learned trial court has rightly declined to treat the issue of jurisdiction as a preliminary issue. Revision petition is consequently dismissed with no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top