SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 1354

G.C.GARG
Ajmer Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

G.C.Garg, J.

1. This revision has been directed against the order of Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Faridkot, whereby an application filed by the defendant for treating issue No. 5 relating to the jurisdiction of the Court as a preliminary issue was declined. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue of jurisdiction is a pure question of law and ought to have been ordered to be decided in the first instance as the defendant petitioner at whose instance this issue had been framed will not lead any evidence. Learned counsel further submitted that in case it is held that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to try the matter, the entire suit shall stand disposed of.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents on the other hand submitted that the land in dispute was taken by the defendant-petitioner on lease and did not vacate thereafter. An order of eviction was passed against him and the writ petition filed against the order of eviction was dismissed and in execution of that order the defendant-respondents took possession. It was thereafter the petitioner filed a petition Under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top