SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(P&H) 38

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
S.S.Kang, J.
Maghar Singh
Versus
State Of Punjab
C.W.P. No. 5283 of 1984,
Decided On : JANUARY 16, 1985

The State Government and the Registrar of Cooperative Societies do not have the authority to interfere with the election process or postpone the elections once the election programme has been approved and published. The Registrar's power to issue instructions under Rule 12 of the Rules is limited to facilitating the holding of elections and does not include the power to postpone or cancel the poll.

Headnote:

COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES - ELECTION - INTERFERENCE BY STATE GOVERNMENT OR REGISTRAR - NO POWERS - ELECTION PROGRAMME ONCE APPROVED AND PUBLISHED CANNOT BE VARIED OR RESCINDED - INSTRUCTIONS BY REGISTRAR TO FACILITATE HOLDING OF ELECTIONS - DO NOT INCLUDE POWER TO POSTPONE OR CANCEL POLL - STATE GOVERNMENT CANNOT ISSUE DIRECTIONS TO AUTHORITIES UNDER THE ACT OR RULES TO POSTPONE OR CANCEL ELECTIONS.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, candidates for the election of the Managing Committee of the Nabha Primary Cooperative Land Mortgage Bank Limited, Nabha, challenged the postponement of the election by the State Government and the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, citing lack of authority to interfere with the election process.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that neither the State Government nor the Registrar had the authority to interfere with the election process or postpone the elections once the election programme had been approved and published. The court also held that the Registrar's power to issue instructions under Rule 12 of the Rules was limited to facilitating the holding of elections and did not include the power to postpone or cancel the poll.

Issues: 1. Whether the State Government or the Registrar of Cooperative Societies had the authority to interfere with the election process or postpone the elections. 2. Whether the Registrar's power to issue instructions under Rule 12 of the Rules included the power to postpone or cancel the poll.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court relied on two Division Bench judgments, Sardar Mohammad v. The State of Haryana and others and Narinder Singh v. The State of Punjab and others, which held that the election process is a democratic process and cannot be stayed or postponed arbitrarily. 2. The court interpreted Rule 4 and Rule 12 of Part I of Appendix C of the Punjab Cooperative Societies Rules, 1973, and held that the Registrar's power to issue instructions was limited to facilitating the holding of elections and did not include the power to postpone or cancel the poll.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the orders of the State Government, the Registrar, and the Manager postponing the election, and directed the respondents to hold the elections within two months.

Judgment

S.S.Kang, J.

1. Whether the State Government or the Registrar of the Cooperative Societies have the powers to interfere with the process of or postpone the elections to a Cooperative Society when the process of election is underway, is the prime question raised in this writ petition.

2. On the expiration of the term of Administrator of the Nabha Primary Cooperative Land Mortgage Bank Limited, Nabha (hereinafter called the Society), its Manager framed the programme of election together with the zonal lists exhibited at the registered office of the Society and other conspicuous places within the area of its operation. He also issued the requisite notices intimating the programme of election. The petitioners filed nomination papers for zones of Babarpur and Sadhoheri. The Manager of the Society was also appointed the Returning Officer. Other candidates filed nomination papers from the various zones on November 21, 1984. Scrutiny of the nomination papers took place on November 22, 1984, and the nomination papers were found to be in order and were accepted. In all the six zones, the candidates were pitted against each other. They were allotted election symbols on November 23, 1984. The polling was fixed for November 30, 1984. By November 28, 1984, all the stages in the election except the polling and declaration of the results were completed. On November 28, 1984, the Deputy Secretary of Government, Punjab, addressed a communication to the Registrar, Punjab Cooperative Societies, Chandigarh, which read as under :-

"Subject :-

Elections in the Cooperative Sector.

In view of the prevailing situation Government desire that elections in the Cooperative Sector may be postponed immediately."

In pursuance of these directions of the Registrar, Cooperative Societies issued necessary instructions to the field staff to postpone the elections to the Cooperative Societies in the State. This order was received by the Manager of the Society on November 29, 1984. Consequently he postponed the elections to the Society on that very day and issued a certificate to that effect (a copy of the same is attached as Annexure P.1). Aggrieved by the action of the State Government, the Registrar and the Manager of the Society, the petitioners have filed this writ petition and have impleaded these Authorities as Respondents 1 to 3 respectively.

3. The writ petition has been resisted by the respondents. Shri B.R. Tanwar, Deputy Secretary to Government, Punjab, has filed written statement on behalf of the State-respondent No. 1 a separate but identical written statement has been filed by the Manager of the Society-respondent No.3. It has been pleaded inter alia that after the assassination of late Prime Minister of India Shrimati Indira Gandhi on October 31, 1984, disturbances took place in certain parts of the country. In the second week of November 1984, the Election Commissioner of India ordered that elections to the Parliament be held from all States and Union Territories except the States of Punjab and Assam. This was done in view of the disturbed conditions of law and order in these States. Keeping in view the law and order situation in the State, the Punjab Government also decided to postpone the elections in the Cooperative Sector. The decision was conveyed by the Government to the concerned quarters for postponing the elections. It was further averred that the Government was anxious that Cooperative Societies be governed by their elected representatives and as soon as the normalcy is returned in the State and peaceful conditions prevailed, the elections would be held. In was admitted that elections to the Primary Cooperative Land Mortgage Bank, Sirhand and Samana in District Patiala were held. However, these were completed by October 31, 1984.

4. The Society was constituted under the Punjab Cooperative Societies Act (for short the Act). It contains provisions for the constitution and management of Societies ; election to the Managing Committees
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top