SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 1300

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
M.M.Kumar and T.P.S.Mann JJ.
Ravinder Singh
Versus
State Of Haryana
Civil Writ Petition No. 8682 of 2001,
Decided On : MARCH 27, 2006

The central legal point established in the judgment is the upholding of the constitutional validity of Sec.175 (1) (q) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994.

Headnote:

Constitutional Validity - Haryana Panchayati Raj Act - The court upheld the constitutional validity of Sec.175 (1) (q) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994.

Fact of the Case:

The court found that the matter was covered against the petitioner based on a previous decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Javed vs State of Haryana, 2003 SC 3057.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the writ petition as nothing remained for adjudication in light of the previous decision.

Issues: The issue was the constitutional validity of Sec.175 (1) (q) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the previous decision of the Supreme Court upholding the constitutional validity of the relevant provision.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed based on the previous decision of the Supreme Court.

Judgment

1. The matter is squarely covered against the petitioner and in civil Writ Petition No.8682 of 2001 -2-favour of the respondents by a decision of the HON BLE Supreme Court in the case of Javed vs State of Haryana, 2003 SC 3057, wherein constitutional validity of Sec.175 (1) (q) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj act, 1994 has been up-held. In view of the above, nothing survives for adjudication in these circumstances. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top