SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 1164

L.N.MITTAL
Sub Registrar, Nuh – Appellant
Versus
Mahipal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants: Mr. Himanshu Raj, AAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT

L. N. Mittal, J. (Oral) : C. M. No. 5900-C of 2011 :

For reasons mentioned in the application, which is accompanied by affidavit, delay of 35 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

Main Appeal :

2. Defendants no.1 and 2 – Sub Registrar, Nuh and State of Haryana respectively, having lost in both the courts below, have filed the instant second appeal.

3. Vidya Devi – mother of plaintiffs and proforma defendant no.3 (all respondents herein) executed registered relinquishment deed dated 20.09.2002 in favour of plaintiffs and proforma defendant regarding agricultural land measuring 87 kanals 01 marla. Defendant no.1 – Sub Registrar, who had registered the said relinquishment deed, issued impugned notice (received by father of plaintiffs on 18.12.2006) requiring the plaintiffs and proforma defendant no.3 to make good the deficiency of stamp duty on the relinquishment deed to the extent of Rs.40,850/-.

4. Plaintiffs (respondents no.1 and 2 herein) challenged the aforesaid demand notice. It was alleged that Sub Registrar – defendant no.1 has no jurisdiction to issue the aforesaid notice under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (in short – the Act). It was also pleaded that







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top