SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 1549

V.M.JAIN
Surinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Shri Baljinder Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mrs. Radhika Suri, AAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

V.M. Jain, J. - This appeal has been filed by accused-appellant Surinder Kumar against the judgment and order dated 27.1.1991 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar acquitting the accused-appellant under Section 302 Indian Penal Code but convicting him under Sections 304-B and 498 Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to undergo RI for seven years and to pay fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further RI for three months under Section 304-B Indian Penal Code and also sentencing him to undergo RI for two years and fine of Rs. 100/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further RI for two months under Section 498-A Indian Penal Code and directing both the sentences to run concurrently.

2. The FIR in this case under Sections 306/201 Indian Penal Code was registered in Police Station E Division, District Amritsar on 11.6.1988 at the instance of Kharaiti Lal PW. Kharaiti Lal PW had produced application Exhibit PF dated 5.6.1988 before the SP, alleging therein that he had married his daughter Smt. Manju with accused Surinder Kumar on 2.5.1982 and after the marriage his daughter Manju, whose name was changed by her in-laws as Kanchan, s












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top