SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 1616

ANITA CHAUDHRY
Randhir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant: Kamal Sharma
For the Respondent: Ajay K. Kansal

Judgment

Anita Chaudhry, J.

By way of the present Regular Second Appeal, the appellant-defendant prays for setting aside of the judgment and decree dated 04.10.2011 passed by District Judge, Jind (hereinafter referred to as 'the First Appellate Court') whereby the suit of the plaintiff was decreed and the judgment and decree passed by the Lower Court was set aside. The parties are being referred as shown in the Lower Court.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that a suit for recovery of Rs.60,000/- alongwith interest @ 2% per month was filed by Ram Kumar on the plea that the defendant had borrowed a sum of Rs.35,000/- from him and had executed a bahi entry in his favour. The bahi was signed by the defendant, in token of its correctness. The defendant had agreed to repay the amount alongwith interest but the amount had not been repaid and the interest had accumulated to Rs.25,000/- and in this manner a sum of Rs.60,000/- was due. The plaintiff also prayed for future interest at the same rate. A legal notice was sent through the counsel but the amount was not paid, therefore, the suit was filed. In the written statement the defendant averred that the plaintiff had no licence to




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top