SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 3089

SNEH PRASHAR
MARU RAM – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mukesh Yadav, Advocate
For the Respondent:Nitin Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

SNEH PRASHAR, J.

1. Assailing the judgment dated 25.02.2011 passed by Railway Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, (for short, "the Tribunal") by virtue of which an application filed by the appellants claiming a sum of Rs. 20,00,000/- as compensation was dismissed, the appellants filed the instant appeal.

2. Precisely, the averments of the appellants in the application for compensation filed by them before learned Tribunal were that Dara Singh was travelling in train no.5RD from Delhi to Rewari and when the train reached in the area of Jakholi railway station, suddenly Dara Singh fell down from the train due to negligence of the railway department/driver of the train. The deceased was said to be a bonafide passenger as he was having a railway ticket purchased for him by Krishan son of Devi Sahai, resident of village Kerli, District Mahindergarh.

3. The application for compensation of the appellants was contested by the respondent-railways. The preliminary objection raised by them was that the application was not maintainable under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 (for short, "the Act") and that the statement of the witnesses recorded by the G.R.P. reveal tha









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top