SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 3546

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Amandeep Sidhu – Appellant
Versus
Ultratech Cement Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Siddharth Gupta
For the Respondent: Mr. J.K. Singla

JUDGMENT :

Raj Mohan Singh, J.

Petitioner has challenged the order dated 02.09.2016 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Phul, District Bathinda whereby application under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC for rejection of plaint was allowed on account of non-payment of ad valorem court fee.

2. Petitioner filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1,00,00,000/- along with interest @ 18 % per annum on account of injuries suffered by him due to negligence on the part of defendant No.1. The compensation was sought under various heads like pain and suffering, medical expenses, loss of future prospects etc. and it was claimed that the defendants were jointly and severally liable for the damages.

3. Defendant No.3 filed an application under Order 7, Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC for rejection of plaint on the ground that Civil Court has no jurisdiction to try the suit and in view of Section 74 of ESIC, the trial Court is not a notified Court, therefore, the Court is not competent to try the suit.

4. The said application was contested by the plaintiff.

5. Plaintiff was an employee of defendant-Firm and suffered injuries when he was returning from his duty. The accident occurred in the area which













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top