SURINDER GUPTA
Sugreev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab And Others – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Surinder Gupta, J. - This is revision against order dated 24.07.2014 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Fazilka, whereby application filed by prosecution to summon respondents no. 2 to 8 and Sonu son of Jai Pal was partly allowed. While Sonu son of Jai Pal was ordered to be summoned as accused to face trial for offences punishable under Sections 302, 307 and 341 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and 25 of the Arms Act, application qua respondents no. 2 to 8 was dismissed.
2. Fir (Annexure P-1) in this case was registered on the statement of Manohar Lal, which reads as follows:-
"Statement of Manohar Lal son of Hanuman Ram caste Bishnoi resident of Raipura P.S. Sadar Abohar aged about 35 years stated that I am resident of above said address and is agriculturist. We are three brothers. Sugreev is the elder and younger to him is Sandeep and I. About 4 years back my father namely Hanuman Ram got purchased 9 acres of land from Seth Mohan Lal son of Mokham Chand resident of Fazilka at village Raipura. On that land Dalip son of Hari Ram Parjapat and Others were having possession as tenant but later on we came to know that the possession of this land is purchased by Vikra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.