SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 763

ARUN KUMAR TYAGI
Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate for the Appellant; Mr. Arjun Singh Yadav, AAG Haryana for the respondent-State

JUDGMENT

Arun Kumar Tyagi, J. (Oral) - The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.126 dated 01.06.2018 registered under Sections 120-B, 148, 149, 201, 285, 302, 364, 365 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Bhattu Kalan, Fatehabad.

2. Reply by way of affidavit of Sh. Subhash Chander, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, City, Fatehabad has been filed in the Court today which is taken on record.

3. After arguing for some time, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to continue with the present petition and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.

4. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.

5. Before parting with this case, it may be observed that the petitioner is in custody since 18.06.2018. As per the information given by learned State Counsel only one prosecution witness out of 44 prosecution witnesses has been examined so far. In view of the observations made by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Doongar Singh vs. State of Rajasthan 2018 (1) RCR Criminal 256 , State of U.P. vs. Shambhu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top