ANJANI KUMAR
U. P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Appellant
Versus
PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS writ petition was heard by this Court and after hearing learned counsel for the parties, it was dismissed on 28th April, 2003, for the reasons to be recorded later on. Now here are the reasons for dismissing the aforesaid petition.
( 2 ) BY means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners--employers U. P. State Electricity Board (now U. P. Power Corporation Limited)have challenged the impugned award dated 3rd September, 1990, passed by the Industrial tribunal-I, U. P. Allahabad (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal) in Adjudication Case No. 168 of 1980, copy whereof is annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition.
( 3 ) FROM the narration of fact, it appears that the respondent workman Mohd. Jamil was employed in September, 1977 as a muster roll employee on daily wages. The services of the workmen were terminated in the year 1979, therefore, an industrial dispute was raised in which two questions were required to be answered by the Tribunal. The Tribunal after going through the pleadings and the evidence adduced by the parties while deciding the point No. 1 have found that the termination of services of conc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.