M.C.DESAI
SHUBRATI KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) THE applicant is being prosecuted under the Motor Vehicles Act on a police report. The report contains the names of two witnesses to be examined for the prosecution; this is in compliance with Section 204 (1-A) which requires a list of witnesses. A summons was issued against the applicant and he appeared before the court and pleaded not guilty. The court started trial following the procedure prescribed in Sections 241 etc. Three witnesses were examined by the prosecution including the two mentioned in the report. The prosecution then applied for an adjournment to examine some more witnesses and in spite of the applicants protest, the court has issued summonses against them. The applicant challenges the courts order on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction to issue summonses against witnesses whose names were not to be found in the list given under Section 204 (1-A ). I do not find any force in the contention.
( 2 ) THE power of a Magistrate to summon witnesses in summons cases is fully and exhaustively laid down in Section 244. It contains no restriction upon his power, it does not restrict it to issuing summonses against the witnesses whose names are
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.