Hon’ble S.U. Khan, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. In this case on 8.11.2010 arguments were heard and judgment was reserved. The said order is quoted below:

“Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Judgment reserved.

Duplicate copy of the supplementary counter-affidavit has been supplied by learned counsel for workman respondent.

It has been stated that FIR was lodged against three other employees of the Bank, i.e. Sri A.K. Madan, Sri Sanjeev Kumar and Sri Amar Nath. Learned counsel for the Bank, petitioner states that this FIR was lodged by Hari Shanker Yadav, who complained that his money was swindled. Learned counsel for both the parties may file short written arguments. Learned counsel for the workman respondent in his written arguments shall indicate the fate of the criminal case, which was initiated on the basis of FIR and if some order/ judgment has been passed, then certified copy of the same shall be annexed therewith. Learned counsel for both the parties before submitting written arguments shall supply copy of the same to the learned counsel for the other side. Arguments may be filed within two weeks.”

3. This writ petition is directed against award da