SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 899

G.P.MATHUR, M.A.KHAN
SANGAM LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
APUL MISHRA, D.S.Tewari, P.N.Misra,

G. P. MATHUR, J.

Sangam Lal has preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 31-1-1977 of IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Allahabad in S. T. No. A-1 of 1976 by which he was convicted under Section 302 I. P. C. and was sentenced for imprisonment for life. Ghanshyam accused who was tried alongwith the appellant in the same sessions trial was, however, given benefit of doubt and was acquitted.

2. Before adverting to the merits of the case, it is necessary to place on record certain disturbing features of the present appeal. The appellant was convicted and sentenced on 31-1-1977 and soon thereafter he preferred the appeal and was granted bail. All the criminal appeals of the year 1977 have been heard and disposed of by this Court several years back but the present appeal was not listed for hearing at its turn. Trijugi Narain, brother of the deceased Smt. Manorama Devi filed an application for hearing of the appeal on which an, order was passed on 30-11-2000 for listing it alongwith the record of the appeal. It was thereafter that the office submitted a report that for a long time the record of the criminal appeal was not traceable in the High Court office. However on a f






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top