SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1679

R.K.AGRAWAL, RAJES KUMAR
The Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) – Appellant
Versus
Raj Motors – Respondent


Advocates:
A.N.Mahajan, S.D.SINGH, S.P.GUPTA, V.K.BIST,

RAJES KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) AT the instance of the Revenue, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad has referred the following question under section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") relating to the assessment year 1982-83 for opinion to this Court: "whether in law and in circumstances of the case, the Honble Income-tax Appellate tribunal was justified in allowing assessees claim of Rs. 2,76,419/- representing Case price difference, holding that the liability accrued and arose during the accounting period relevant to the assessment year under consideration as a result of final agreement dated 20. 9. 1981?"

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are as follows.

( 3 ) THE assessee-opposite party (hereinafter referred to as the "assessee") deals in sales of motorcars and their spare parts as a dealer of M/s Premier Automobiles Ltd. During the course of assessment proceedings for the assessment year 1982-83, it was noticed that the assessee had debited a sum of Rs. 2,76,419/- in profit and loss account under the head car price Difference paid to M/s Premier Automobiles Ltd. and accordingly claimed it as deduction during the year under consideration from its






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top