SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 2874

[2010(6) ADJ 3 (NOC)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : SHRI KANT TRIPATHI, J.
SHRI G. SAGAR SURI ....Applicant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS ....Opposite Parties
(Criminal Misc. Application No. 26919 of 2008, decided on 26th August, 2010)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Hari Lal Pandey and G.S. Chaturvedi for the Applicant; Anurag Khanna, M.P. Srivastava, Satish Trivedi, Siddharth Srivastava, V.K. Jaiswal, Dinesh Kumar and A.M. Tripathi for the Opposite Parties.

Headnote:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 482—(Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Sections 406, 420, 467 and 468—Criminal proceedings—Quashing of—In fact parties entered into agreement for sale—Petitioner alleged to agreed to sell certain land in favour of respondent No. 3—Received earnest money of three crore—Concealed stay order already obtained by M/s. S.V.B. Builders against him—Therefore, intention of applicant was dishonest at very inception of transaction—Concealment of fact known, shows dishonest intention on part of applicant—Criminal proceedings against applicant sustainable.

       

G. SAGAR SURI vs STATE OF U. P. - 2010 Supreme(All) 2874
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top