SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 1871

ANIL KUMAR SHARMA, RAKESH TIWARI
GAURA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
SHAHZAD KHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Brijesh Kumar Srivastava for the Appellants.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—The appellants have challenged the award dated 2.4.2012 passed by MACT/Additional District Judge (Court No. 11, Agra in MACP No. 177 of 2008, whereby the claim petition of the appellants under Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act had been dismissed.

2. The claimants filed the claim petition alleging that on 3.3.2007 deceased Rampal parking his bike near Manoj Dhaba on Fatehabad Road, Agra was talking with Constable Ramesh Babu, then at about 4 p.m. the driver of Jeep registration No. UP 80M/6760 driving the vehicle rashly and negligently knocked down the deceased and he succumbed to the injuries. It was alleged that deceased was hale and hearty man of 32 years and was whole-sale fruit seller and his monthly income was Rs. 10,000/-. The widow, children and parents of the deceased filed claim petition for an award of Rs. 18,87,400/-.They contended that the offending vehicle was owned by respondent No. 2, insured with respondent No. 3 and at the time of accident it was being driven by respondent No. 1. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 denying the factum of accident stated that on the date of accident the alleged offending Jeep was insured with respondent No. 3. They further









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top